Footnotes
1.
Some books and newspapers have said that there were 22 guests at the party. This is incorrect. The confusion has come
about because there were 20 guests at the party, plus Ken and Ruth Nash, making a total of 22 people at the party
altogether. The correct total is 20 guests + 2 hosts. There may have been a 23rd person in the house that night.
According to The Bogle Mystery (see the
Bibliography), Ruth Nash's mother, then an 80-year-old woman, lived with them. The
question of who was at the party is a different matter. The party has taken on a legendary aspect similar to that of
Woodstock -- that is to say, if everybody who claimed to be there really was there, the numbers would have been a lot
higher than they were. However, as stated above, there were only 22 people at the party, and a list of them in
alphabetical order is provided here. The names are not necessarily complete, and in the case of the Johnsons I am not
sure whether this is their surname or if it is an abbreviated version of the hyphenated "Moodie-Johnson". Nevertheless,
here is the list:
2.
A barbeque held for CSIRO staff on 21 December 1962 in MurrayBank, Sydney. Among those who attended the barbeque were the
Chandlers, the Nashs, Margaret Beavis, Gib Bogle and the Paytens.
3.
Some sources give the time of this phone call as being 10:10am, but this seems unlikely.
Mr Styles, the River Avenue resident, gives the time of the police arrival at the
scene as 9am, which is clearly a rough estimate. More importantly, McCormick and Wheway returned along the track and saw
the body (McCormick for the second time) at approximately 8:45am. With the time taken to tell
Mr Little (the youths stopped for a few minutes on the way to the kiosk to look
for fish from the bridge), for
Mr Little to return with them, and for him to then phone the police, 9:10am
would seem to be a very likely time, while 10:10am would be exceedingly unlikely.
4.
Sydney afternoon edition newspaper. Along with The Sun, it was one of the two Sydney afternoon newspapers of the
period. Both are now defunct.
5.
As quoted in As Crime Goes By... (see the
bibliography).
6.
The Age (Melbourne), 8 September 2006.
7.
Sydney Morning Herald (Sydney), 8 September 2006, though this is also a direct quote from the documentary.
8.
Bogle-Chandler case solved?, from ABC program "News in Science", 8 September 2006, from URL:
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/2006/1735996.htm?health
I have given the quote in context, but for anybody who is interested the full quote from Associate Professor Winder on the
website is/was "These two people may have been distracted by other activities [so] that's not necessarily impossible."
9.
What he actually said was: "If it sneaks up gradually, you may not even notice the smell because the sensory epithelium in
the nose becomes habituated." I think I have paraphrased it correctly. Quoted from article Bogle-Chandler case
solved?, on ABC website and program "News in Science", 8 September 2006, URL:
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/2006/1735996.htm?health
10.
Bogle-Chandler: the river did it, News.com.au, 7 September 2006, though the quote is originally from the
documentary. URL for this article is/was:
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20373464-1702,00.html
11.
Bogle-Chandler case solved?, from ABC program "News in Science", 8 September 2006, from URL:
http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/2006/1735996.htm?health; also
The World Today – Answer to 40-year-old mystery may be rotten egg gas, from ABC program "The World Today, 8
September 2006, from URL:
http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2006/s1736524.htm. The latter has a much longer transcript containing this
quote, but ultimately it is derived from the documentary.
12.
Bogle-Chandler: the river did it, News.com.au, 7 September 2006 (URL for this article is/was:
http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,20373464-1702,00.html). It is true that this evidence was
suppressed at the time of the inquest, but that there was a semen stain on Dr Bogle's jacket has been publicly available
knowledge since at least the 1980s. That it was "quite fresh" seems to be new information, however.
13.
It is my presumption that he told this to the Sydney Morning Herald. The quote is taken from the 17 September 2006
edition of the newspaper.
14.
The Australian, 9 September 2006.
15.
Author's note: I was in Salamanca, Spain, at the time of the broadcast and consequently, on 7 October 2006 when I first
published details about the hydrogen sulfide theory on this site, I had not seen it. The documentary was subsequently
released on DVD and I can confirm I have now watched it.
16.
It probably records in police files whether the observation was made on 2 January or 12 January, but this is information
that I am not privy to.
17.
The part of the interview in question did not make the broadcast cut, but is in the extras section of the DVD (which I
recommend to anyone).
18.
Australian Secret Intelligence Organisation.
19.
Incredibly, this is true. According to New Scientist, 3 November 2007, details were first published in
Science, vol 138 p1100. The elephant in question was named Tusko, and the event took place at Lincoln Park Zoo,
Oklahoma City, on 3 August 1962.
Having decided to find out what would happen if you give an elephant LSD, Warren Thomas, the zoo's director, was assisted
by Louis Jolyon West and Chester M. Pierce of the University of Oklahoma School of Medicine. They fired a cartridge
containing 297 milligrams of LSD (about 3000 times the normal human dose) into the elephant, which reacted as if it had
been shot. After trumpeting for some minutes the elephant fell over and despite attempts to revive it, died about an hour
later.
20.
To date I have not been able to independently verify the Brixton prisoner story. The only source I have been able to find
for it is an article by Phillip Knightley and Alex Mitchell in the Sun Herald, 27 May 1989. The article goes into
some detail, however, and seems convincing.
21.
Quoted from the address Ken Buckley gave at the Annual General Meeting of the Sydney branch of the Australian Society for
the Study of Labour History, on 29 March 2004. Under the title From Communism to Civil Liberties: Autobiographical and
Political Reflections, the text of the speech is/was available from the URL:
http://www.asslh.org.au/sydney/hummer/vol4no2/buckley.htm
http://www.boglechandler.com/bcFootnotes.html
Return to Main Page